You can't put a price on the weather, but Xcel Energy Inc. executives determined that it's responsible for most of the company's profit growth last year.
Minnesota's largest utility said Thursday that its profit grew 7 percent, or 13 cents a share, in 2013 and much of that came from the effect that extreme weather conditions had on energy demand. Weather contributed earnings of 11 cents a share, Xcel said.
Minnesota was hit by an extended winter, with parts of the state even experiencing a snowstorm in May. The state, along with others that Xcel serves like Colorado and Texas, also experienced a hotter-than-usual summer that drove demand for air conditioning.
In a discussion with analysts, Xcel executives said the weather-related effect on its financial performance was outsized and unlikely to soon be repeated. "You can't count on 11 cents, that's for sure," Xcel Chairman Ben Fowke said.
Xcel operates in so many states that a convergence of extreme weather conditions is rare. Just this month, Xcel's largest market, Minnesota, experienced extreme cold while its second-largest market, Colorado, had mild weather.
When an analyst asked whether Xcel would adjust its first-quarter outlook upward because of Minnesota's cold January, Teresa Madden, Xcel's chief financial officer, suggested that Colorado might be an offset. "It's so early, and things can change with weather," she said.
Xcel's financial outlook assumes that weather conditions will follow a historical average, though the company routinely tracks deviations from that pattern.
In 2013, the company's measurement of heating degree days, those days when temperatures are colder than normal and drive up heating demand, was 8 percent greater than the historical average and 15 percent greater than in 2012.