Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
After years of working in municipal government, I’ve seen firsthand that one of the most important — and often least visible — responsibilities of city government is persuading the Minnesota Legislature to provide two critical things.
First, the state provides funding to pay for essential city projects when the benefits of those projects extend beyond a city’s borders or are too expensive for one city to afford alone. For example, in fiscal year 2024, the city of Minneapolis asked the Legislature for $44.45 million for the Nicollet Avenue Bridge over Minnehaha Creek, $8.34 million for the renewal of a 36-inch water main, $5 million to implement the ADA Transition Plan and $3.9 million for the Bossen Terrace Sanitary Sewer Project.
Second, the state provides policies — state laws that allow cities to operate effectively. Minneapolis has pushed for important reforms such as the 2020 police accountability legislation and, most recently, for the repeal of the state law preventing cities from enacting their own gun-safety ordinances following the Annunciation School shooting tragedy.
These cooperative efforts depend on a shared understanding among lawmakers in both the Minnesota House and Senate — including Republicans and Democrats from the suburbs and greater Minnesota alike.
But here’s the problem: When ideological extremes — like the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) — dominate the Minneapolis City Council, it significantly damages the city’s credibility and its ability to build those essential relationships. The rhetoric from the far left in our city government has become so rigid and combative that it alienates the very legislators who would otherwise support Minneapolis because they understand how important our largest city is to the whole state. As a result, many Republican and even centrist Democratic lawmakers simply tune out our city altogether. In a Legislature that is both polarized and closely divided, Minneapolis cannot afford to lose the support of any group.
The consequences are real: Minneapolis loses influence, loses funding, and loses opportunities to strengthen public safety, infrastructure and essential services.