Opinion editor’s note: Strib Voices publishes a mix of guest commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Carrying the heading “U of M Morris enrollment drops in half. How will MN campus survive?” the Minnesota Star Tribune’s Aug. 16 article on the University of Minnesota’s Morris campus uses legitimate concerns about enrollment as grounds for giving longtime critics of the university a platform from which to relaunch old policy attacks on UMM’s mission and to question its place in the University of Minnesota system moving forward.
Were the article more than tangentially concerned with enrollment, it would have highlighted the fact that this year’s incoming freshman class is 20-25% bigger than last year’s.
Were the article concerned with a genuine discussion of UMM’s place in the university system as a whole, and less with giving existential critics of UMM a place to air their grievances, it would not have reduced Board of Regents Chair Doug Huebsch’s recent statement on the subject to just two words (“vital part”) before returning the floor to UMM’s critics.
The chair’s statement is worth reading in its entirety:
“As a freshman from rural Minnesota, I chose to start college at the University of Minnesota Morris. It was a great decision for me, just as it is today for new generations of students. Morris is a vital part of the University of Minnesota as well as the state’s rural economy. I’m deeply supportive of the University’s ongoing efforts to serve the state’s workforce needs and community engagement in Morris and throughout Greater Minnesota.”
For me, the decision to attend UMM was life-changing. I first visited UMM 50 years ago, as a high school senior. By the end of the day, I knew where I would be going to school that fall. UMM was everything I thought an undergraduate college should be. It still is.