Free agent movement has been sloooooow for the Twins this offseason, which shouldn't be surprising since baseball's hot stove generally takes a while to heat up.
Not much even qualifies as "news" yet on the Twins front, but there are rumblings, at least, that free agent pitcherJustin Masterson is on their radar.
Several other teams are also intrigued by Masterson, per that tweet from Jerry Crasnick, but it's worth at least a discussion of what kind of deal would make sense for the Twins … and what type of pitcher they would be getting if they landed him.
First off, Masterson fits the Phil Hughes mold of "buying low," since he's coming into his free agent season after a down year. Masterson was 7-9 with a 5.88 ERA with Cleveland and St. Louis last season. He entered the year as the Indians' ace; he ended it in shambles. Hughes, you'll recall, was 4-14 with a 5.19 ERA in 2013 with the Yankees before his very good 2014 season with the Twins.
Masterson, like Hughes, had two pretty good seasons out of the three preceding his real clunker, posting sub-3.50 ERAs and topping 190 innings in both 2011 and 2013 with Cleveland.
Most projections have Masterson looking for a one-year deal in order to build his value back up. MLB Trade Rumors pegs that deal at around $12 million per season — not exactly the same bargain as Hughes' three-year, $24 million deal in terms of annual value but less of a risk when it comes to the length.
Prior to 2014, he was looking for a multi-year extension from Cleveland in the $17 million/year neighborhood, but those talks broke off in spring training and we have to think the Indians are glad they did. (At the very least, noted Indians fan Bob Collins is glad they did and does not give Masterson a ringing endorsement).
The Twins flat-out need arms. Their cumulative starting pitching remained atrocious in 2014 despite Hughes' contributions. But would Masterson on a one-year deal give them enough of a bump to be competitive? That's highly debatable, and the answer is probably no. Developmentally, they are better off giving those innings to a guy like Trevor May or Alex Meyer. Competitively, though — at least in the short-term — even an average version of what Masterson was between 2011-13 (205 IP, 3.86 ERA) would solidify the rotation and mean more wins. Again, we're probably talking about the difference between a team in the mid-70s and one that could get to .500 — neither would be contenders, but selling the Target Field public on a better product in Paul Molitor's first year could be, right or wrong, a factor in the Twins' front office decision-making.