SLAYTON, Minn. — Fire Chief Chris LeTendre said he felt helpless watching the top of a utility pole burn, dropping embers near an apartment complex. Dousing the pole meant risking electrocution, so he sprayed the ground with water and waited for Xcel Energy to arrive to cut the power.
That took more than four hours. In the meantime, the burning pole shorted the system and knocked out power for the town’s entire west side, he said.
The utility pole debacle is among the reasons Slayton wants to kick Xcel out of its city and form a new government-run electric provider. It is an extraordinary step and one driven by frustration with Xcel’s everyday service and emergency response.
Many in the town of 2,000 people feel they were left behind, stuck with crumbling infrastructure compared to Xcel’s bigger cities, and far away from help.
If Slayton succeeds, it would be the first in Minnesota, and unusual around the country.
A few large, wealthy and politically progressive cities such as Minneapolis and Boulder, Colo. have explored creating a municipal utility in hope of speeding the use of renewable energy. In the face of Xcel’s opposition and the cost of that change, those two cities failed.
Slayton’s fate now rests with state utility regulators, who will weigh in on a critical disagreement: how much it should cost the city to oust its power company.
Xcel tried to convince the city it’s worth sticking by their side, and spent millions to improve its local infrastructure amid the dispute. In a statement, Xcel spokesman Kevin Coss said the company respects Slayton’s right to municipalize.