Thinking non-binding thoughts

Did caucus-goers vote differently, knowing that they weren't locking in the state's votes at the national convention?

February 14, 2012 at 4:02PM
A vote for delegates of Precinct 19 took place in a classroom at Southview Middle School in Edina the site of the Republican caucus event on Tuesday night.
A vote for delegates of Precinct 19 took place in a classroom at Southview Middle School in Edina the site of the Republican caucus event on Tuesday night. (Dml - Star Tribune Star Tribune/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

What difference resulted in Tuesday night's GOP precinct caucuses from an awareness that the presidential preference votes that were cast were "non-binding" -- that is, would not ultimately determine how the state's national convention delegates would vote?

Watching Minnetonka Precinct 4G, I got the sense that it may have mattered quite a bit.

When a fellow in the back of the Eden Prairie High School classroom voiced doubts about Rick Santorum's electability, precinct chair Mimi Burkhardt admitted that she, too, had some qualms.But, she said, she knew that the vote she and her 25 caucus-mates were casting was a straw poll, good for the evening's headlines and candidate claims of momentum, but not a lot more.

"If there were delegates on the line, I might cast a different ballot," she said. "I want to keep this guy (Santorum) in the race a little longer." Heads nodded around the room. The Precinct 4G vote: Santorum 11, Newt Gingrich 6, Mitt Romney 5 and Ron Paul 4.

The Minnetonka caucus-goers were a seasoned lot. One veteran cast his eyes around the room and told me he saw two, maybe three fresh faces -- no more. Most participants were well schooled in the fine points of the quandrennial caucus-to-convention exercise. Their votes expressed not just a preference, but a strategy.

about the writer

about the writer

loristurdeva

More from Minnesota Star Tribune

See More
In this photo taken Monday, March 6, 2017, in San Francisco, released confidential files by The University of California of a sexual misconduct case, like this one against UC Santa Cruz Latin Studies professor Hector Perla is shown. Perla was accused of raping a student during a wine-tasting outing in June 2015. Some of the files are so heavily redacted that on many pages no words are visible. Perla is one of 113 UC employees found to have violated the system's sexual misconduct policies in rece

We respect the desire of some tipsters to remain anonymous, and have put in place ways to contact reporters and editors to ensure the communication will be private and secure.

card image