Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Of all the descriptors attached to Vivek Ramaswamy, the 38-year-old political tyro enjoying a bizarre surge in the Republican primary race for second place, the most common one seems to be "annoying." After the Republican presidential primary debate last week, a Politico headline quoted a party strategist about Ramaswamy's performance: "It just got to be annoying." In a widely shared essay, writer Josh Barro, a Harvard contemporary of Ramaswamy's, probed the quality that "makes Vivek so annoying." In a column, CNN's S.E. Cupp called him: "Obnoxious. Annoying. Disrespectful. Inexperienced. Conspiratorial."
Matt Lewis, an anti-Donald Trump conservative writer for the Daily Beast, marveled that there are some who actually like Ramaswamy's cocky, know-it-all persona: "As Seinfeld might say, 'Who are these people?' "
The answer, of course, is much of the Republican Party. The Washington Post, FiveThirtyEight and Ipsos polled likely Republican primary voters before and after last week's debate. After his performance, Ramaswamy's favorability rating rose, to 60% from 50%, even though his unfavorability rating rose even more, to 32% from 13%. Participants in a CNN focus group of Iowa Republicans declared him the debate's winner, as did a poll released Thursday from JL Partners. The day after the debate, his campaign reportedly raised more than $1 million.
The question is what Ramaswamy's supporters see in this irksome figure. Some Republicans, clearly, appreciate the way he sucks up to Trump, whom Ramaswamy has called "the best president of the 21st century." But that doesn't explain the roughly 10% of Republicans who tell pollsters they're planning to vote for Ramaswamy instead of Trump. It can't only be his shtick as Fox News' "woke and cancel-culture guru," as one anchor called him, since at this point even Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has learned that railing against wokeness is a losing message. Nor is Ramaswamy's appeal tailored to the downwardly mobile Trump voters who appreciated the former president's pledges to protect their entitlements, since Ramaswamy's promise to "dismantle Lyndon Johnson's failed 'Great Society'" makes Paul Ryan look like a social democrat.
Instead, I suspect that Ramaswamy's fans are drawn to him for all the reasons his critics find him insufferable. Conservatives love being championed by representatives of groups that they think disdain them. Despite the right's deep resentment of the entertainment industry, Republicans tend to adore celebrity candidates, from Ronald Reagan to Arnold Schwarzenegger and Donald Trump. Think of the infamous tweet from Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee: "Kanye. Elon. Trump." (They deleted it once rapper Kanye West's right turn veered into outright Hitler fandom.) At Democratic conventions, I've seen famous actors walk around either unrecognized or ignored, while at Republican conventions C-listers are feted like superstars.
Ramaswamy, too, is a performer, but what he's performing is a parody of meritocratic excellence. If you've spent time around entitled Ivy League grads, you probably recognize him as an exaggerated version of a familiar type: the callow and condescending nerd who assumes that skill in one field translates to aptitude in all others. But to his fans, the very fact that he's such a pure product of elite institutions — in addition to Harvard, he went to Yale Law and made his fortune with a biotech startup he ran from Manhattan — probably gives him extra oomph as a class traitor.