Out of the Boston bombings, I observe a small but interesting thing. We all saw "The Star-Spangled Banner" as done at the hockey game. Then we saw the same thing at a Red Sox game — everybody standing together, singing together — the way a national anthem should be employed, uniting all in music.
I'd much rather hear 30,000 people singing such a song together than any pop star doing it alone, no matter how good that pop star may be.
We've seen so many famous singers take their shots at doing the "Banner." Whitney Houston will never be forgotten for her stirring version.
Then again, there was Roseanne, who chewed the "Banner" and spit it out — not only musically, but with a crude attitude.
There have been barbershop groups, college choirs, regionally noted musicians of all sorts, service members from all branches of the military — not to mention firefighters, police and even some athletic stars.
I can understand why the job has been turned over to the pros. Our national anthem is indeed a difficult song to sing. The lowest note and the highest note are an octave and a half apart — quite wide for even the better singers.
The words are dated, arriving to us as it were from the War of 1812 and the pen of Francis Scott Key. The melody is an obscure English song. There is strong evidence that other patriotic songs out there might serve better as our country's musical emblem.
I taught music for 34 years, and directed our high school band in about a thousand performances of the "Banner." I have seen our high school choir sing it. I have seen some high school kids sing it, with varying degrees of success. I have even seen a kindergarten class sing it for some of our sporting events.