Which is better: the active voice or the passive voice?
Compare "I let go of the Cessna's strut and prayed my chute would open" with "The Cessna's strut was let go of and a prayer that my chute would open was said by me."
You may be thinking: As long as my chute opens, who cares?
Point taken, but in those examples the active voice, in which the subject of the sentence performs the action, is clearly better than the passive voice, in which the subject receives the action.
Compare "Over the holidays three dozen cookies were eaten and five books were read by me" with "Over the holidays I ate three dozen cookies and read five books." Again, the active voice is more direct, concise and emphatic.
The passive voice, however, is sometimes better for emphasis, diplomacy and flow.
1. Emphasis
Use the passive voice to emphasize the receiver rather than the performer of the action. Compare "I altered the wording to illustrate a point" with "The wording was altered to illustrate a point."
The active voice is more emphatic, but if the emphasis is on the act of altering the wording, the passive voice is better.