It ain't the pigs.
The hog industry leaped into damage control Monday as headlines around the world reflected fears of a pandemic popularly known as "swine flu" despite few connections to hogs or eating pork.
Early reports on the flu that has killed more than 140 people in Mexico and sickened others in the United States and Spain caused investors to punish the share price of hog companies such as Tyson and Smithfield Foods. Futures prices for hogs fell, too, as investors concluded the flu would curtail demand for pork.
China, Russia, Indonesia and the Philippines have blocked pork imports from Mexico and some U.S. states, but not Minnesota.
Yet none of the evidence so far suggests pork eaters or hog farmers should be concerned because the virus, which contains parts of swine, human and avian flu viruses, does not appear to be infecting pigs, nor coming from them.
"It is not justified to name this disease swine influenza," read a statement from the World Animal Health board, based in Paris.
The virus contains parts of the swine flu, but it's different from the common swine flu that sweeps through hog farms every year, said Mark Whitney, a swine expert with the University of Minnesota extension service.
"It's a completely unique virus," Whitney said.