No settlement emerged Monday in a contract dispute that could force more than 60,000 patients with coverage from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota to pay sharply higher out-of-network rates or seek care elsewhere.
A spokeswoman for Minneapolis-based Children's Minnesota said Monday morning that a "large gap" remained between the two sides, and there was no word by late afternoon about whether the health plan and hospital were any closer to an agreement.
Children's and Blue Cross are pushing a July 5 deadline, at which point tens of thousands of patients at Children's would face out-of-network charges for care at the hospital. In many cases, the charges could be prohibitively expensive.
On Monday, the lingering dispute had politicians offering to help, patients on edge and nurses lamenting the impasse.
"They're two big companies, they're fighting and patients are getting stuck in the middle," said Elaina Hane, a union leader with the Minnesota Nurses Association who's a nurse at the St. Paul campus of Children's. "It's unfortunate."
Blue Cross said it needs Children's to agree to Medicaid payment rates that are more comparable to other hospital systems. Children's counters that the proposed rates are too low and would force significant service cuts.
If an agreement can't be reached, Blue Cross said patients can be treated at other medical centers, but Children's contends other pediatric hospitals don't have sufficient capacity.
At the University of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, which is one of the medical centers that Blue Cross is counting on as a substitute, officials Monday said the hospital is preparing to care for patients and make transitions "as seamless as possible."