A new analysis shows that Minnesota's job market is probably in better shape than we thought.
The state has clawed back about 110,000 of the 156,000 jobs it lost in the recession, a 70 percent recovery, state economists said this week in their latest forecast. They based that conclusion on a set of job data that's less current but considered more reliable than data the state issues every month.
That monthly data has shown a job recovery closer to 55 percent of what was lost. But job creation appears to be twice what the monthly reports have been saying, said Steve Hine, the state's labor market economist.
"I think that's pretty significant," he said.
Meanwhile, employers across the nation added 146,000 jobs in November, surprising analysts who thought superstorm Sandy would have slashed employment, the federal government reported Friday.
The discrepancy in the Minnesota numbers is between the federal government's monthly household surveys and the state's quarterly census of employers.
State-specific monthly job numbers from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) are based on surveys that state economists like Hine have argued are flawed. The quarterly census is based on unemployment insurance records, which account for all workers.
This esoteric debate had its time in the sun in 2011, when Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker argued the quarterly census numbers were more accurate and was lambasted for releasing them early. The fact that he did so a few weeks before his recall election opened him to criticism.