The term layoff once meant a loss of work with the expectation of getting called back when business picks up.
That's not what the word really means anymore. Maybe business slowed down or the plant simply closed, yet the precise reason won't really matter to the worker just laid off. That job is never coming back.
Understanding that difference between a break in employment due to a (hopefully) once-a-century pandemic and the permanent loss of the job is a big deal when trying to understand what's happening in the economy right now, to workers as well as businesses.
Lots of people came back to work off a furlough in May, enough to swing the total jobs number for the United States, reported last Friday, well into a positive territory. And that's great.
It's just that May was another terrible month of layoffs — the second worst month in the more than 27 years the Chicago outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, Inc. has been tracking layoff announcements of U.S. employers.
A little more than half of these job cuts were attributed directly to the COVID-19 pandemic, according to the firm's research, presumably to the actions taken to slow down the spread. But the rest of the layoffs were attributed to things like market conditions or a slowdown in demand.
As you maybe remember from last week, pretty much nobody foresaw the headline number of the jobs report of last Friday, a gain of 2.5 million jobs. That includes the economists regularly polled by Bloomberg. And they didn't just miss it, they missed it by two country miles.
There were technical hiccups in the report, suggesting that the real unemployment rate was more like 16.4% rather than the 13.3% that was reported, although that same adjustment would have been appropriate in April. In either case, the labor situation really did improve in May.