Politicians of all stripes have learned you can't go wrong pledging to do more for the nation's small business owners.
From Nancy Pelosi to Michele Bachmann, it's a given that small businesses are America's engine of job creation. The small business lobby has managed to leverage this conventional wisdom into a series of tax breaks, loan subsidies and other exemptions that would make AIG or any other recipient of federal bailout money proud.
Too bad it's not entirely true.
Nearly one-third of all Americans work at firms with fewer than 50 employees, so small businesses are vital to our economy. But the notion that they grow faster and create more jobs is a myth that endures despite a growing body of evidence that suggests job creation in the United States has more to do with a firm's age than its size.
If Congress really wanted to jump-start the U.S. job-growth engine, it would focus less on small businesses in general and more on one particular type of small businesses: start-ups and very young companies.
A 2009 survey by the Kaufmann Foundation found that firms that were less than a decade old generated 64 percent of all U.S. jobs created in 2007. Likewise, Maryland economist John Haltwinger reviewed more than a dozen years of data and found that companies less than 10 years old, and start-ups in particular, made substantial contributions to new job growth. Otherwise, he found no systematic link between the size of a firm and net job growth rates.
That's not news to Dan Carr, CEO and founder of the Collaborative, which provides networking and other services for venture capital-backed companies in Minnesota. The Collaborative likes to work with and on behalf of companies that are small, but that want to grow fast.
The problem right now: Venture capital investment is shrinking. The impact on the number of start-ups is unclear at this point, though the number of companies that attended the most recent annual meeting of the Collaborative slipped this year, to 375.