By the slimmest of margins, Select Comfort shareholders on Thursday rejected a proposal to grant a private equity firm a controlling interest in the bed manufacturer.
The leadership of the Plymouth-based company, which was looking for an infusion of cash, struck a deal with Sterling Partners three months ago to allow the equity company to buy a 52.3 percent majority interest for $35 million, or 70 cents a share. But the stock has been trading closer to $3 a share in recent days, closing at $2.77 the day before the shareholders' meeting.
After two meeting recesses to tally the votes, General Counsel Mark Kimball announced shortly after noon that 49.94 percent of the shares present and eligible to vote had cast ballots in favor of the Sterling proposal -- not enough to seal the deal.
As news of the shareholder vote spread, the company's stock rose. In regular trading, Select Comfort closed Thursday at $2.83, up 6 cents or 2.17 percent. But the stock shot up rapidly in after-hours trading, reaching $3.25 a share, or a boost of 14.84 percent.
The results were clearly a disappointment for Sterling Partners and quite a departure from a typical highly scripted corporate shareholders' meeting. Patrick Hopf, who had been picked by Sterling to become the new Select Comfort CEO, tried to head off the voting results announcement immediately after Kimball told the assembled shareholders that "the polls are now closed."
The would-be CEO stood up at the back of the meeting room in The Northland Inn in Brooklyn Park, said he owned 73,750 shares and made a motion to adjourn the meeting until Sept. 15.
Kimball ruled him out of order because he said that any shareholder proposals needed to be provided to fellow shareholders in advance of the meeting.
Kimball then provided the voting results. Defeat of the Sterling proposal means that Bill McLaughlin remains chief executive officer. He was unavailable for an interview after the meeting, so it's unclear how he and the board of directors plan to address the company's financial condition and strategic direction in light of the Sterling proposal's defeat.