At first glance it would appear that the end of April Todd-Malmlov's tenure as head of MNsure was a straightforward case of being held accountable for performance.
She had a big job, running the online insurance exchange that is the centerpiece of the state's effort to implement the Affordable Care Act, and the exchange is still working far from perfectly. As the deadline for getting consumers insured is now measured in days and not weeks, the hourglass is down to the last few grains of sand.
Todd-Malmlov was the boss, errors kept happening, and so now there is a new boss.
That narrative, of course, is mostly nonsense.
Todd-Malmlov had her job due to her command of health policy and, presumably, the reality of health care politics. She's out because she had become a political liability of the first order for Gov. Mark Dayton, not because of the performance of a website she was in charge of delivering.
The performance of MNsure wasn't perfect, but it should have been good enough. Alok Gupta, professor of information and decision sciences at the Carlson School of Management at the University of Minnesota, put it this way: "I was surprised that MNsure worked as well as it did."
Certainly mistakes were made by MNsure's leadership, as mistakes always are, but maybe none so fundamental as agreeing to take this no-win job in the first place.
"Let me give you some context," Gupta said. "When companies do something enterprise-wide, they usually have a time frame of from two to seven years to implement the whole thing. This scale [for MNsure] in some sense is much bigger. The complexity is greater. And they had less than two years."