Financial literacy training, through books or in school, seems to be an enduringly popular solution to the chronic problem of people living paycheck to paycheck.
Another example in this genre arrived at the office not long ago, "The Kids$Vest Project," by former James J. Hill Center President Greg Fouks. It's both a personal finance book and an introduction to a broader educational program.
Fouks covers a lot of familiar territory but he does it well, including clearly explaining the impact of compound interest. He peppers his work with facts on the financial challenges of Americans, including how seven out of 10 of us know we can't retire or lack the savings to do so.
One of his ideas to fix the retirement funding problem is to have teenagers learn enough about saving and investing that they then establish their own Roth IRA. Through steps like this, he wrote, kids can learn that they really can achieve financial security.
Yet a fair criticism of this book, and pretty much all others like it, is that it makes achieving financial security sound a little too easy. It therefore follows that, if people still live on the financial edge after many years of working, the problem must be them.
And one problem with financial literacy as a solution is that, in many families, teaching Fouks' money lessons wouldn't have made much of a difference. That's because all the kids knew growing up in poverty was always going without, and so it was never going to be easy once they have a few dollars to resist spending them.
This insight now seems obvious, but that's only after reading through the real-life financial lessons essayist Samantha Irby described in a book out a few months ago called "We Are Never Meeting in Real Life."
She admitted she had no idea how middle-class parents taught their children about money. But she certainly knew how poor parents did.