Commissioner Roger Goodell and his NFL owners voted in a new conduct policy for players earlier this month, and in doing so, Goodell made this clear:
The NFL is more worthy to judge the severity of an offense than America's legal system, and the league will be handing down suspensions and taking away players' money with no regard for what might happen eventually in a court room.
This display of pomposity received applause (for the most part) from the NFL's well-trained national media and the league's enormous fan base.
The support for Goodell and the NFL on this drives me crazy, because I'm still one of those old-fashioned folks who thinks that due process is a good thing.
If you don't believe in it, look what happened to Todd Hoffner, the Minnesota State Mankato football coach, and the two years in Hades that he went through after some school administrators looked at a home video on his cell phone and had a mass psychotic breakdown.
Hoffner's back, he took his team to the national championship game, but even the game story from a stringer that we ran in the Star Tribune on Saturday's 13-0 loss to Colorado State-Pueblo included details of the two years of torture that Hoffner and his family went through.
Ah, but what the heck, why give any benefit of the doubt to the accused when you have people with the wisdom of an NFL commissioner or a college bureaucrat to override the courts?
This is one buzz word that causes me to slap myself upside the head, when hearing or reading praise for Goodell and his over-the-top disciplinary actions – specifically, in the Adrian Peterson case: