•••
The Star Tribune's editorial on Dec. 21 was titled "Trump must not be above the law." A concern presented was that if the Justice Department does not prosecute him, he "could ride the resulting wave of re-energized Trumpers to the Republican presidential nomination and beyond. What power could stop him after that?"
The power I'd like to see in the first place is an overwhelming, undeniable, verified vote against him in the next presidential election. That would be the best way to rid us of the curse that he is. Go ahead, Republicans. Nominate him. Bring it on.
Jim Bartos, Maple Grove
•••
Ashli Babbitt was killed during the violent Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol assault. We don't hear much about her death, but death was entirely foreseeable. On Dec. 22, the Star Tribune ran a Wall Street Journal editorial arguing that the events of Jan. 6 were merely a "rally that turned into a riot" ("No case to charge Trump"). No WSJ mention was made of why Trump wanted to disarm the metal detectors. No mention was made of the likely evidence that Trump knew some protesters were armed. No mention was made of Trump's rhetoric to fight like hell. No mention was made of the 187 minutes of Trump silence during which he watched the violent assault on the Capitol. No mention was made of Trump's anti-Mike Pence tweet or the gallows erected to hang Pence, which doesn't seem consistent with a mere rally.
And for me, I can't forget that even if a reasonable person did not foresee that this "rally" would cause some death, that certainly became foreseeable when the "rally" became violent. Trump watched while his confidants urged him to call it off. It was obvious to Trump's advisers that the "rally" was there because Trump called them there. It was obvious to Trump's advisers that he had the influence to end the "rally." It was apparent to all that this "rally" had become a violent attack on the Capitol, on Pence and on Congress. Trump was not a mere spectator. He had called for the "rally." He was president of the United States.