Minneapolis leadership has lost its way. After reading the Star Tribune Instagram headline "Minneapolis Park Board: No more citations for women going topless in the parks," I just had to shake my head. I am no prude, but I also appreciate people who take time to consider our current city climate. Could there possibly be other issues to prioritize more than this one? The last nine months have been all about masking up and being vigilant about personal hygiene. Is our new Minneapolis motto "Mask up! Shirts off!"?
C'mon, Minneapolis, you can do better than this! We are not even in the correct season. It's winter, for goodness' sake!
Susie Valentine, Minneapolis
POLICE
On reforming our departments
The St. Paul initiative toward "unbundling" police services seems like a logical and simple path toward accomplishing something tangible related to police reform ("Handling the basics of city policing," editorial, Nov. 23). This path should not be controversial. Private businesses have been doing this for years. It's a proven practice typically known as outsourcing. It makes sense to realign work tasks/responsibilities away from generalists (which is what police officers are) toward trained specialists who can perform those tasks/responsibilities in a more effective manner. Of course the reallocation of budgeting and funding must follow, thus providing a path where the number of "generalist" police officers can be reduced. Based on current staffing needs, this really means not needing to hire officers to fill open positions. Best wishes to St. Paul for speedy realignment of tasks, responsibilities and services.
Tom McDonough, Eagan
• • •
A few weeks ago, the Minneapolis City Council narrowly approved in a 7-6 vote to allocate $500,000 to the Minneapolis Police Department to bring in outside officers for the alleged purpose of quelling the city's rise in violence ("Mpls. council OKs help for police," front page, Nov. 14).
I did a quick Google search for more background information on the situation, and the first article that popped up was from the Star Tribune, titled, "Most of Minneapolis City Council pledges to 'begin the process of ending' Police Department." The City Council's pledge to begin the process of ending the MPD stands in stark contrast to the council's most recent decision to award a significant amount of money to the same Police Department that killed George Floyd and has killed 22 Black people (eight unarmed) since 2000, also according to the Star Tribune.
I am dismayed and disappointed that my council member, Lisa Goodman, has been leading the charge for more police in Minneapolis when it is clear that MPD has not been effective in reducing violent activity across the city but has been effective in bringing irreparable harm to countless Minneapolis residents.
I understand that people are uncertain and afraid during these trying times, but the City Council owes a duty to the residents it promised to protect by defunding the MPD. As City Council member Andrea Jenkins said, "It's possible to be conflicted and know what the right thing to do is." I wholeheartedly agree: The existence of conflicting opinions about the fate of the MPD does not diminish the fact that the unequivocally right thing to do is to stop funding a force that has essentially unfettered power to kill Black and brown people with near impunity. I stand with my community members who are, have been and will continue to call for defunding the police.
Erin Anderson, Minneapolis
• • •
I do not have the perspective of former Deputy Chief Gregory Hestness ("Do police make us safer?" Opinion Exchange, Nov. 20), but my experience as an instructor for professional drivers and as night manager of a transportation company brought me into frequent contact with both police administrators and beat officers in Minneapolis. I've seen courage frequently and less than that also frequently.