May the memory of Nils Hasselmo be a blessing ("With a steady hand, he guided the U through some tough times," obituary, Jan. 24). And may he be remembered as the University of Minnesota president who advanced LGBT rights thoroughly, in every way asked of him, at the institution. As president, Hasselmo commissioned a yearlong study of homophobia and transphobia at the U, and he put LGBT students, staff and faculty in charge of the effort. He supported the creation of domestic partnerships for LGBT students and staff so that same-sex couples had equal benefits. He supported the advancement of LGBT academic studies, the creation of a campus support office for LGBT students, staff and faculty, and he updated all human-resource policies to eliminate institutional homophobia and transphobia. The 1990s were an era of legal setbacks for LGBT rights across the country, but at the University of Minnesota, Nils had our back, and the progress made under his tenure has endured to this day. Rah Rah Rah for Ski-U-Mah, and three cheers for this Minnesota Swede, a champion of equality.
Gary Schiff, Minneapolis
The writer is a former member of the Minneapolis City Council.
• • •
One day in 1996, when I was an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota, I brought my 5-year-old twins to the university. As we crossed the Williamson Hall plaza, I caught sight of President Hasselmo, talking with a few colleagues. I knelt down to point him out to my kids, and he saw us looking at him across the way. He left the group and bounded over to meet my little ones.
In reading about his tenure as president, I was reminded of the excellence of his leadership, but it's his spontaneous kindness that I remember best.
Melissa S. Anderson, Minneapolis
AMERICA, PART ONE
Our process, our problem
Even though the majority of Americans want to end the shutdown, in Thursday's votes in the U.S. Senate, Republican senators from red states with relatively small populations in which President Donald Trump still polls positively voted against ending the shutdown. This reflects the problem that, given the ratio of senators representing states with small populations relative to the larger U.S. population, on this and other issues, the Senate does not represent the opinions of the American public.
While many Democrats representing states with large populations such as California, New York or Illinois support ending the shutdown, they are outvoted by senators representing states with smaller populations. As noted in a Washington Post column by Philip Bump (https://goo.gl/ziGm1c), since 1790, "the most-populous states making up half of the country's population have always been represented by only about a fifth of the available Senate seats." Bump also notes that the problem will only worsen in the future, citing a report by the Wall Street Journal's Gerald Seib "that by 2040, about 70% of Americans are expected to live in the 15 largest states. … They will have only 30 senators representing them, while the remaining 30% of Americans will have 70 senators representing them."
Richard Beach, Minneapolis
• • •
In junior high school, I learned how a bill becomes law. A bill is drafted; introduced; goes through hearings in the House and Senate, where the issue is debated; experts on all sides testify; votes are held; and the president signs or vetoes the bill after a final draft is approved by both houses.
For two years, the current president did not submit a bill; no bills were heard; and no experts testified as to whether the proposal for a "wall" is the best way to deal with immigration issues. Holding the American people hostage to fulfill a campaign promise is disgraceful.