Historically, when our country was in crisis, the president would sit calmly before a TV camera in the Oval Office and speak directly to the nation — one-on-one, so to speak. His tone would be reassuring, presenting a picture of the situation and calling for all citizens to pull together through troublesome times. Think Ronald Reagan or FDR.
Fast forward to today: Our current president communicates through tweets and campaign-style rallies, delivered principally to fire up his base. His tone is pompous, and his "facts" are often proven to be false or at best inaccurate. He appears to care more for his personal image than the American people who look to him for leadership.
It is time again for our president to address the nation from the Oval Office — to look into that TV camera and convince us we are all headed in the right direction and there is nothing to fear. I am a patriotic American, and I am waiting, Mr. President.
Peter Whatley, Little Canada
'THE NEXT BATTLEFIELD'
Plans for a space force are simply unnecessary; we're covered
I am a former Air Force officer who then, as a physicist, spent 34 years in the aerospace industry developing new technology. Most of that time was spent working on Air Force space projects. The new threats mentioned by the administration ("Pence outlines Space Force plans," Aug. 10) have long been recognized, and we developed counter-technology for it. Since those threats have never been imminent, they have never been moved to operational hardware, but the technology is there. I always found the Air Force forward-thinking and possessed of good planning.
The days of fleets of manned spacecraft roaming through space are at least a half century away. The Air Force can and should handle the job of building, deploying and operating the systems needed to counter the stated new (supposedly) threats. We do not need the expensive overhead of a new service. Let the Air Force Space Command do the job.
Don Stauffer, Coon Rapids
CARBON TAX
Do use taxes to fund social programs — the realistic way
I had not heard about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez' idea of funding Medicare for All with income from a carbon tax, but I heartily agree with Megan McArdle ("As a funding mechanism, it's a pot of fool's gold," Opinion Exchange, Aug. 7) that such a plan would be absolutely unworkable.
The best way to implement a much-needed price on carbon is through a national Carbon Fee and Dividend plan, as advocated by the Citizens' Climate Lobby and the Climate Leadership Council. Such a plan would rapidly decrease our carbon emissions while protecting both the economy and the underprivileged by returning the fees to all households as a dividend.
And universal health care needs to be financed the way most civilized nations do it, with higher taxes for all. Yes, all people who earn enough money to pay taxes would need to pay more. But in return, we would all have accessible health care, and we would all be invested in improving our health care system, by making it more efficient and outcome-based. Some taxes are worth paying.