It has struck me that it is almost amusing, except that it is really quite sad, that our legislators have spent so much time debating Sunday liquor sales ("Sunday liquor sales by July?" Feb. 28). Those proponents say "the people have spoken!" Rather, most citizens don't really care, and it is once again the lobbyists representing the interests involved who have spoken — while more important issues, such as inadequate roads, crumbling bridges, threats to our water supplies and chaotic health care programs, all will probably get kicked on to another session.
This reminds me of how many years the Legislature debated the all-important issue of how many fishing lines and hooks can be used. As I look across the St. Croix River to our neighboring state, I wonder how long it will be until Minnesotans find themselves in the same race to the bottom in terms of services and programs that truly matter to their constituents.
John Oldendorf, Lake Elmo
• • •
A Roseville liquor store owner had this to say about the law allowing Sunday sales: "We've had a system that's worked very well. They should have left it alone."
Yes, sir. We've had a system that's worked very well — for you. This may be a news flash to you, but you are not the only citizen of Minnesota.
John Sturtz, Stillwater
MILITARY SPENDING
If Trump gets all that money, he's likely to find a way to use it
The Pentagon recently buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in Defense Department administrative waste, yet we have the president seeking a historic 9.2 percent increase in military spending — $54 billion, plus an additional $30 billion in supplemental funds at a time when we have wound down major wars in Afghanistan and Iraq ("Trump's budget boosts military," Feb. 28). It is clear that a new war is being planned. I guess we will have to wait to see what Trumped up charges he will use to take us to war.
Thomas Dirnberger, Apple Valley
REPORTING AND EDITING
Detail from criminal complaint ought to have been omitted
I am writing in response to the report on Christopher Blair, the Level 3 sex offender at large after being charged with raping a 12-year-old girl in South St. Paul ("Hunt on for sex offender charged with rape," Feb. 28). The story is horrific enough without the addition that "the criminal complaint described the girl as having 'special needs and [who] makes bad decisions.' " The writer and his editor may believe that portion of the complaint is worthy of reportage, but I argue that repeating this claim in the Star Tribune reinforces the fallacy that any girl, regardless of her physical and/or mental capability, can "decide" to be raped by an adult. Indeed, the St. Paul Pioneer Press did not include this information about the victim in its report on Blair's disappearance. I strongly suggest that future reporting on rape and sexual assault cases in the Star Tribune be edited to eliminate the suggestion of victim-blaming.
Shannon Drury, Minneapolis
HEADLINE WRITING
Paper chose wrong thing to emphasize, thus tilting story
So much has been made recently about the press, politicians, fake news and words. The headlines of a Feb. 27 Star Tribune article about an altercation at the Minneapolis Institute of Art included "An argument, possibly involving neo-Nazis, turned physical in a gallery of valuable 18th century art."