Should people who use the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (the program formerly referred to as "food stamps") receive more federal assistance if they choose to shop at higher-priced grocery stores (e.g., Byerly's) than people who choose to shop at lower-priced grocery stores (e.g., Cub)? I don't think so.
Those individuals who think different amounts of aid should be given based on choice may be more likely than others to favor the proposal to forgive all student college loans. The analogy of grocery stores to colleges is not completely far-fetched. Higher-priced stores and higher-priced colleges (often private) have more pleasant surroundings, more personal services and probably a greater range of offerings. But, higher- and lower-priced stores all offer the basics, e.g., milk, eggs, produce, ground beef, etc. Higher- and lower-priced colleges all offer the basic intro courses in English, math, social sciences, sciences, etc. Forgiving debts because someone chose to go to an expensive college instead of a less expensive college is bad policy.
Policy changes that would benefit college students and society include: public funding for the first two years at public colleges and vocational-technical schools, giving people the option of refinancing loans, and expanding loan forgiveness for individuals willing to work in communities that are having a difficult time attracting professionals in certain service areas.
Elaine Hauff, Minneapolis
BERNIE SANDERS
Socialism has a long history in our country — as do its electoral failures
Socialism is not new in American politics. The most well-known socialist and political activist was the novelist Upton Sinclair, who ran for the governorship of California in 1934. Running as a Democrat, he championed a program "End Poverty in California" (EPIC). Just before the election, he wrote that EPIC was "polling the largest vote ever cast in a California primary." He hoped to end poverty by taxing the super rich (taxes on high-value property) and promised a better life for all. He managed to get more than 879,500 votes but he was defeated by Republican Frank Merriam, who branded Sinclair as a radical and who received more than 1,138,600 votes. Not a landslide, but a significant defeat for one of the most prominent and praiseworthy socialists in the 20th century.
Eugene Victor Debs was the Socialist Party presidential candidate five times. Sen. Bernie Sanders would undoubtedly do better than Debs in a national election, but the history of socialists getting elected in America does not have a great track record. The Socialist Party had only two members in the U.S. Congress: Meyer London from New York, who served 1915-19 and 1921-23, and Victor Berger from Wisconsin, who served 1911-13 and 1923-29.
The ideals of socialism, as with EPIC, are inspiring, but the prospect of socialism in an election does not inspire confidence.
Charles Taliaferro, Minneapolis
• • •
The Democrats have themselves to blame for the mess they're in with Sanders. If they wanted to block him for being outside the party proper (as indeed he is. He is a Democratic Socialist — they have their own party!), they should've done so back in 2015, when he first ran. But they didn't want to alienate the legions of Young Turks that he brings to the table. So they have repeatedly allowed him to function within the party. And now they are going to pay the price.
They could've made nice with him back in the day, but that would've involved clarity and confrontation, and heaven forbid anyone engage in such sordid pursuits. They don't have that opportunity anymore. Millions of idealistic young voters are going to feel twice-violated. There is no way they'll support Joe Biden.