•••
U.S. Rep. Tom Emmer is "proud to endorse" a man found liable for fraud, found liable for sexual assault, credibly charged with scores of other crimes and utterly incapable of escaping his own pathological narcissism ("Emmer 'proud to endorse' Trump," front page, Jan. 4). Look no further for the answer to the question of why Republicans cannot win statewide offices here.
Chris Malecek, Mendota Heights
•••
It continues to befuddle me that Republicans support a twice-impeached potential criminal who faces dozens more charges in the next year. I really don't get it. Operating by my gauge, if I had been accused of any one of Trump's 90-plus charges, I'd be in jail — years ago.
Now, I understand that our elected officials play to their bases. And the Minnesota GOP representatives confirmed that when they said Trump was a clear front-runner for president and was needed to right President Joe Biden's failed policies. They didn't mention that the "right" person to do that was held liable for the sexual abuse of a woman and defrauding lenders in his New York business dealings. Or that he is on tape trying to get information on his opponent's son in return for U.S. aid to Ukraine. Or that he pressed election officials in Georgia to "find" him just enough votes to sway the state from Biden to Trump in the past election. Or that Trump peddled the Big Lie that he had indeed won despite dozens of court cases that decided that he didn't. Or that the Big Lie and Trump's exhortations of it on Jan. 6 led to death and destruction during an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol by hundreds of Trump's lemmings.
His defense and that of the most vocal of his supporters is that he is being framed by the "Deep State" and that Jan. 6 was much ado about nothing more than a casual and orderly stroll through the Capitol. Recent surveys of Republicans found that about a third of them believe every conspiracy theory about the "Deep State's" power to destroy Trump; that he is blameless and deserves to return to the Oval Office. These beliefs are not based in fact but in cultlike adherence to a man who has proven time and again that he cares only for his aggrandizement. And if our congressional leaders are willing to buy into this scenario, what does that say about them?