For the first time ever, Sunday's Star Tribune made my day — and year. I have sorely missed Steve Sack's editorial cartoons during his vacation the last few weeks. When I opened the paper to three full pages of his 2019 work in the Opinion Exchange section, I nearly burst into tears of joy. He has been on my mind a lot lately, as I glance at the work of his stand-ins, wondering in most cases, what on earth is the point? I urge the Star Tribune to adopt this New Year's resolution: In honor of Steve Sack, who has no peer, we will cease publishing syndicated substitutes and rerun previous Sack editorial cartoons. Thank you in advance for earning kudos from legions of Steve Sack devotees.
Sandra Nelson, Minneapolis
• • •
To only have Sack's opinions on the Opinion Exchange is completely one-sided. Next week, will you have the Republican rebuttal?
Darlene Blossom, St. Paul
• • •
Sunday's spotlight on cartoonist Sack's hate- and prejudice-laden work once again reminded me of why I canceled the daily Strib. His obsessive hatred of Trump and the Republican Party dominated the work that was published. The cartoon on the cost of an assault rifle vs. the number of people killed in mass shootings perfectly highlighted the incomparable hypocrisy of the liberal left. Sack, in his tiresome and predictable way, ignored the stupendous loss of human life through abortion, which utterly dwarfs the number of gun deaths. But why let a few such inconvenient facts get in the way of another Sack hatchet job when you can buy ink by the 55-gallon drum? I would cancel my Sunday subscription in a heartbeat if not for my wife insisting that the coupons are worth more that the cost of the paper. We're fed up with being insulted, demeaned and marginalized by the increasingly irrelevant mainstream media. Keep it up, Sack. November can't come soon enough!
Bob Kruse, Bloomington
• • •
I have no problem with the Star Tribune publishing cartoons by conservatives, but the grotesque image of a donkey that looked more like some horror show idea of a skull (editorial cartoon by Phil Hands of the Wisconsin State Journal, Dec. 27) that made my 5-year-old cry when she happened to see it was over the top and does no one any good, particularly your newspaper, conservatives or the cartoonist who drew it.
Barbara Robinson, Minneapolis
SPEAKING OF HUMOR
Sack's, good; that of stupid television advertising, bad
Soon it will be 2020, the year I will turn 90. I have had plenty of exposure to publications, television and advertising. So let me say, first, I love the Star Tribune, especially Steve Sack's cartoons and your editorials. But I have a few questions about television advertising, which dominates the screen these days.
When did insurance companies decide that low humor would sell policies? They are investing loads of cash into thinking that readers will make the switch from stupidity to enlightenment.Then there are the lunchtime ads, aimed at us older folks. Do we really have to know about constipation, Depends, alarms, medicines and such while we are eating? Also, how come companies spend so much on cures for skin problems? Are there really thousands of people waiting to know that?
Just think, if television had only lived up to its promise to educate and inspire people, circa 1950s, we would all be so smart. Oh, and another thing. The national weathermen and women love to strike terror in the hearts of viewers with their predictions that "millions" of people are in the path of a snowstorm. Do we have to panic? Well, thank goodness for PBS, our Public Broadcasting Service. And thank goodness for our newspaper. They give us hope.
Mavis Amerson Voigt, Minneapolis
ST. PAUL SNOW PLOWING
When the snow falls, the clock on easy removal begins running
As a resident of St. Paul, I wholeheartedly agree with the Dec. 27 editorial regarding snow removal in our city ("St. Paul is in a rut with snow removal"). St. Paul residents deserve better. However, I disagree with the primary cause of our rutted streets. Our streets are in the condition they're in not because cars aren't ticketed and towed. They are a mess because St. Paul Public Works chooses to wait until snow is compacted and rutted, frozen solid, before even attempting to plow residential streets.