The fire that destroyed Paradise, Calif., precipitated a dream in which I saw my son, daughter-in-law and two young grandsons standing on a deserted Lake Erie beach near their Ohio home. The sun was setting. As the sound of "Waltzing Matilda" became deafening, I awoke. I'd been thinking about climate change, as I do a lot these days. It's one of the factors implicated in the deadly Paradise blaze ("Deadliest Calif. fire matched," Nov. 12).
"Waltzing Matilda" was made memorable by the 1959 film "On the Beach," a science-fiction drama about the last survivors of nuclear apocalypse. We're facing climate apocalypse. It too is our fault, but this time it's real. Most of us know that, though many feign denial. But we won't act to avert the apocalypse until a critical mass of us feel it in our guts as well as know it in our heads. There are signs that we're approaching critical mass.
We also know what must be done, and we have or are developing the means to do it. But — and I think this is possible in view of the recent election results — we need a sea change in political "climate" before governments will act. Only then will we have the luxury of many future generations in which politicians can squabble endlessly over ideology and self-serving but not potentially civilization-ending issues.
CAROL STEINHART, Madison, Wis.
• • •
I am reminded of the adage about "not seeing the forest for the trees," when I read President Donald Trump's recent tweet, where he said that California's deadly fires are due to "gross mismanagement of the forests. Remedy now, or no more Fed payments!" Instead of focusing on the tragic loss of lives, and real solutions, he resorted to his usual finger pointing and partisan rhetoric.
Yes, management of the federal forests is a factor here, since most of these forests are overgrown, and thus more fire-prone. And this situation is often due to fire-suppression policies. But correcting this problem will require the thinning out or controlled burning of these forests in a sustainable manner. And more federal money, not less, as the president threatens, will probably be necessary.
Another factor he totally ignores is that the fire seasons in the western U.S. are getting progressively longer, hotter and drier. Climate scientists aren't making all this up. Plus, many of the ravaging fires are taking place in nonforested areas.
President Trump may conveniently overlook the complexity of this issue. But it does need urgent attention. So politicians of both stripes do need to look at real, pragmatic, and yes, cost-effective solutions. And please try to skip the divisive rhetoric.