Many folks watching Monday's debate noticed something odd about Mitt Romney. He abandoned his tough-guy rhetoric and positioned himself as the candidate of peace.
"We can't kill our way out of this mess," he said. Instead, he promised to "help the world of Islam ... reject this radical violent extremism."
There's a flip side to the irony. President Obama, the liberal law professor, has become the lord of drones, raids, ousters and assassinations. He hates troop deployments but loves to purge, punish and liquidate.
He's not the candidate of war. He's the candidate of vengeance.
I'm not saying the candidates have totally switched postures. Romney is still trying to out-macho Obama on military spending, on standing up to Russia and on not apologizing for America's sins. Obama is still calling Romney "reckless" and complaining that the former governor would leave too many troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. But Obama's complaint is about leaving our soldiers overseas after we've done the job. Obama is all for doing the job, if we can kill the bad guys and get out.
Monday night, Obama used Bob Schieffer's opening question about Libya to deliver part of his stump speech: "We ended the war in Iraq, refocused our attention on those who actually killed us on 9/11. And as a consequence, Al-Qaida's core leadership has been decimated." Decimated is Obama's code for drone strikes. But the core of this pitch for refocusing on Afghanistan is to get the people who killed us. Not that Afghanistan is turning out any better than Iraq, mind you. It's not about curing the world. It's about payback.
Obama didn't answer Schieffer's question about what went wrong in Benghazi, Libya. He talked about the aftermath instead, when we would "go after those who killed Americans and we would bring them to justice."
Like George W. Bush crowing about Saddam Hussein, Obama couldn't stop waving the scalp of Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi. "Got rid of a despot who had killed Americans," Obama bragged.