Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
I first covered U.S. Sen. Mitt Romney in 2012, when he was "former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney," then running for president.
At the time, Romney was so gee-whiz and perfectly presented that he was hard to take seriously. It was like Barbie's Ken was running for president, if Ken had political consultants and a mansion with a car elevator in California. Regrettably, I often referred to Romney on social media as "Mittens."
The Mitt Romney of 2012 didn't connect with many voters, it turned out, and President Barack Obama was easily re-elected to a largely successful second term. But the Obama years also gave rise to the Donald Trump era, which eventually led Romney to run for the U.S. Senate. As Trump's opposite in nearly every way, Romney wanted to provide a counterpoint to the president he saw as not just dishonest but dangerous.
Once elected to the Senate, a different Romney, maybe the real Romney, emerged. He was still earnest, but also frank, self-deprecating and, in his forthcoming biography, "Romney: A Reckoning," brutally forthright about what he has seen in Washington since then.
That same gee-whiz quality was transformed into a sort of conscience for Senate Republicans, whether they wanted one or not. That frequently left him on the outside looking in, but always speaking up.
Media coverage of Romney's retirement announcement last week has mostly focused on his statement that being in his 70s is part of the reason he's going. And it's true that he warned his fellow senior citizens, including President Joe Biden and Trump, to give it up and let the kids in their 50s and 60s lead the country.