Investors are paying hefty tuition for Capella Education's crash course in the ways of Washington.
Shares ofthe for-profit university, which hit an all-time high of $98 in April, lost almost 40 percent of their value after Congress and regulators began raising sharp questions about the value and cost of a for-profit education. Revelations about abusive student recruiting tactics, questionable degrees, burdensome debt and high student loan default rates followed, and the Department of Education is set to release new rules early in 2011 that could make it tougher for Minneapolis-based Capella and other for-profit colleges and universities to qualify for federal student aid.
Capella has not been named in any of the investigations, and there's plenty of evidence, including higher graduation rates and lower student-loan default rates, to suggest that it may be one of the industry's better operators. But if regulators come down hard on the entire industry, it will feel the sting.
"We've been successful because our learners have been successful," said Kevin Gilligan, Capella's chief executive officer. "The key to sustainability in this business is providing our students with a quality education."
This isn't the first time the for-profit education sector has found itself in the dean's office. On at least three previous occasions -- the 1940s, 1970s and early 1990s -- regulators stepped in and imposed tougher rules and restrictions on the industry. Over time, industry lobbyists eliminated or weakened those restrictions, and the industry surged. In 1997, there were 170 private for-profit four-year institutions. In 2007 there were 490.
One of the supreme ironies of the for-profit education sector is its almost total dependence on taxpayer dollars, in the form of federally subsidized education grants and loans. The average for-profit school gets 84 percent of its revenue from federally subsidized loans and grants, and many schools max out at the federal limit of 90 percent.
How are they doing with our money? Not so good. Students who attend for-profit schools are less likely to graduate and two to five times more likely to have debt of $40,000 or more. And while for-profit schools represent only 11 percent of all higher education students, they account for 26 percent of all student loans and 43 percent of all loan defaulters.
These numbers may be appalling, but they also can be somewhat misleading. Students who enroll in a for-profit institution are more likely to be working adults who are enrolled part time and thus more likely to drop out. The default figures are also slightly skewed by the presence of career schools, which typically have higher default rates.