In the 10 years since Katrina came ashore in Louisiana and flooded most of the city of New Orleans, I've never been able to listen very long to proposed fixes for the city.
They all seemed to be versions of the same idea, to stop spending so much to rebuild a coastal city that lies largely below sea level. It's good money after bad.
"I've been there," I would usually say quietly. "I can't agree."
The idea to skip rebuilding parts of the city was not just the small talk of Minnesotans I met; policy wonks had similar ideas. These were people described recently by the writer Malcolm Gladwell as the fixers.
Katrina was a cataclysm, killing approximately 1,400 people. To the fixers, it was also an opportunity.
They saw a chance to empty neighborhoods that were hard to protect from the water and more often than not had a lot of crime. And now was the time to overhaul the notoriously ineffective public school system.
It is easy to see myself as one of the fixers, because as a business consultant, I had no shortage of ideas of how things could be done so much better. It's what I do now, too, only in a thousand words in the Star Tribune rather than in a PowerPoint presentation.
I lost interest in talking about fixes after a few hours in New Orleans. It didn't seem possible to explain, face-to-face with a homeowner desperate to come back home, why the neighborhood shouldn't be rebuilt.