The baby boom that usually follows a recession still hasn't happened in Minnesota.
The state's birthrate continues to decline and the overall number of births has not recovered to its prerecession peak, according to a new report from the Minnesota State Demographic Center.
"Typically after a recession we expect a rebound in births, because everyone will decide that they're feeling economically secure at about the same time," said Susan Brower, the state demographer. "We haven't seen that yet."
Economists watch childbirth numbers because lower fertility — absent increased immigration — means fewer workers for companies to hire and a smaller tax base to pay for care for the elderly. A boom in childbirths would help the economy by prompting more consumer spending and forcing families to buy more new homes.
A five-year dearth of babies, also reflected in national numbers released this past week, is likely the result of continued economic uncertainty and cultural assimilation by minority groups, which saw their fertility rates fall surprisingly fast in the past four years.
Fertility rates for Latina women, for instance, dropped from about 3.5 children per mother in 2009 to under 2.5 in 2012. Black fertility rates are also dropping, though not as dramatically.
The overall number of births in 2013 rose to 69,183, an increase of 500 babies over 2012. That was nearly 4,500 fewer births than in 2007.
The birthrate fell slightly to 12.8 babies per 1,000 Minnesotans in 2013, extending a long-term trend of gradual decline. That compares with 15.5 babies per 1,000 in 1990 and 25.1 per 1,000 in 1950. There are a number of explanations for the decline.