Medtronic Inc., which plans to cover its top leaders for certain taxes they face as part of a controversial merger plan, has calculated the cost for the CEO's tab alone at $25 million.
The Fridley-based medical device giant disclosed to shareholders this week that it would pay an estimated total of $63 million to compensate high-ranking executives for special excise taxes they would incur if Medtronic acquires surgical supplier Covidien and moves overseas in the process.
Medtronic officials argue that paying executives' excise taxes — which are on top of the capital gains taxes all shareholders pay — actually puts the officers and executives on a level playing field with the rest of the company's shareholders. Additionally, the company says its leaders wanted to evaluate the merits of the deal without facing a personal financial disincentive to proceed.
"The company believes these individuals should not be discouraged from taking action that they believe is in the best interest of Medtronic and its shareholders," Medtronic spokesman Fernando Vivanco said in an e-mail. The payments allow them to "focus on what is in the best interests of the company, and not on their personal finances."
The $42.9 billion deal, which the companies say offers significant strategic benefits, is controversial primarily because incorporating in Covidien's home of Ireland would also bring tax advantages to Medtronic. President Obama and others have attacked such tax "inversion" deals as unpatriotic, and there are moves afoot in Washington to stop them.
But the tax payments for CEO Omar Ishrak and other top Medtronic figures have also raised the ire of some shareholders — even before the amounts were known — because the company won't be covering the significant capital-gains taxes that the deal will trigger for longtime shareholders.
"I thought it looked really bad," said Minneapolis corporate consultant David Schall, who acts as a proxy for his father, longtime former Medtronic board member and shareholder Richard Schall. "I thought it was disingenuous to say they were acting in the best interest of the shareholders, but then … they took care of themselves."
The deal could close by the end of the year, pending approval from shareholders and the Federal Trade Commission.