A prominent U.S. senator has sent a letter to Medtronic Inc. asking why a previous request for the names of the company's paid medical consultants did not include an orthopedic surgeon who is now being investigated for allegedly overstating the benefits of a Medtronic product used to repair spine and bone injuries.
In a May 18 letter to Medtronic CEO Bill Hawkins, Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, said he was "concerned" that Dr. Timothy Kuklo's name was not on the list of consultants Medtronic provided. The letter was made public in Wednesday's Congressional Record.
Grassley, ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, is investigating what he calls "substantial" financial ties between the medical device industry and physicians. Kuklo, a former surgeon at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, is accused of making false claims about the use of Medtronic's Infuse bone-growth product in soldiers injured in Iraq.
In October, Grassley sent a letter to Hawkins requesting the names of doctors who have consulting agreements with the company, specifically those involved with its Infuse product.
Approved for use in the lower back and for some dental applications, Infuse is often used by doctors "off-label" -- in ways not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Last July, the FDA warned doctors that using Infuse in the neck could lead to serious complications.
Medtronic provided Grassley with financial information for 22 doctors and dentists who practice nationwide. They earned between $100 and $67,600 a year; but Kuklo was not on the list, nor were any doctors from Minnesota.
Officials at Walter Reed said an investigation found that a study conducted by Kuklo and others probing the use of Infuse to heal bones shattered in warfare overstated the product's benefits. The study was published in a British medical journal, which later retracted it. The Walter Reed investigation was reported in the New York Times last week.
Medtronic confirmed Wednesday that Kuklo became a consultant in August 2006, but said his work for the company was not related to the Walter Reed study.