The lawsuit doesn't read nearly as well as the story, which laid bare the life of an NHL enforcer for all to see. The way John Branch wrote about Derek Boogaard in the New York Times should have been enough to cause even the most hardcore hockey fan to reconsider the peculiar role that goons play in the sport.
It was a sad and troubling tale of a kid growing up in Canada, raised to do just one thing — fight on the ice. A big, hulking man, Boogaard was so good at it that he not only made it to the NHL but had a contract with the New York Rangers paying him $1.6 million a year when he died of an overdose of painkillers two years ago at the age of 28.
Now his family is suing the league, claiming it should have done more to prevent both Boogaard's brain injuries and his addiction to pain pills.
"He was there protecting his teammates at all costs," his mother, Joanne, said in a statement released by her lawyers, "but who was there to protect him?"
Just how much merit the suit has will, of course, be decided in court, though it's worth noting that it had barely been filed in Chicago when speculation began that it could be a forerunner in the NHL to the NFL's burgeoning concussion lawsuit.
Like the story, though, the biggest value of the suit may be that it helps further expose the bizarre and dangerous culture of the enforcer in the NHL. And if that helps lead toward the elimination of hockey goons — and hockey fights — then Derek Boogaard's survivors will have done their job.
We all know hockey players are tough. We see it every night in arenas across North America.
They don't have to fight to prove it. And teams certainly don't need to be paying big guys (Boogaard was 6-foot-7) big money just to have them on hand when it comes time to settle scores.