Over a chorus of objections from state authorities and medical experts, a man convicted of raping three teenage girls in the early 1990s was granted conditional release by a judicial panel last week from the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP).
Christopher Coker, 47, who in 1991 abducted and raped a 15-year-old girl under a bridge, and then raped two other girls less than a year later, has been approved to live under heavy surveillance in a halfway house after a three-judge state judicial panel ruled that he had shown "great progress away from sexual dangerousness."
The Minnesota Department of Human Services and Hennepin County Attorney Mike Freeman both vowed Wednesday to appeal the judicial panel's ruling, which could delay or ultimately prevent Coker's release into the community.
The Coker case stands out because it is rare for a sex offender to be discharged from the MSOP amid opposition from nearly all of the parties involved. Two independent psychologists who evaluated Coker testified that they opposed his petition for provisional discharge; three MSOP administrators also did not support his discharge.
In addition, one judge on the panel that approved Coker's petition for release wrote a rare dissenting opinion, arguing that his "lack of cooperation with his treatment team" and opposition to terms of his discharge plan made him unfit for living in the community.
The panel's decision to grant Coker's release, over these many objections, reflects the intense pressure the state is facing to reform the MSOP, which was declared unconstitutional in June by a federal judge. The judge, Donovan Frank of the U.S. District Court in St. Paul, has called the MSOP "draconian" and "clearly broken," in large part because so few offenders are ever released from the program.
Only five offenders have been granted provisional discharge from the MSOP in its 20-year history; however, three of these offenders have been discharged just this year. The judge has ordered the state to propose ways to bring the program up to constitutional standards or face possible reforms imposed by the court. A court hearing on the proposed remedies is set for Sept. 30.
Appeal planned soon
"This is highly unusual," said Freeman, who said his office intends to appeal the discharge ruling within 15 days. "I can't remember a case where every single medical examiner has said, 'No, this guy should not get out,' and two of the judges said, 'Yes.' … We think public safety calls out for this guy not to get out at this time."