Minnesota legislators are trying to fix a growing problem hitting small to midsize businesses hard: so-called "patent trolls."
Legislators want to block individuals or firms who buy patents — sometimes with no intention of making a product or technology — and then sue businesses who they say are violating the patents. In some cases, they aren't.
The proposal would allow the attorney general to bring civil action against someone who has made a "bad-faith claim" in a patent issue. These "trolls" would face a penalty of up to $50,000 per violation.
"It's not a big deal until you're the one being sued, or you're the one getting that demand letter," said state Sen. Kari Dziedzic, DFL-Minneapolis. Trolls "usually demand a settlement, and sometimes it's cheaper to settle and that's not fair to the average consumer."
Businesses have found the cost of fighting a frivolous claim in court staggering. A review of a single, simple patent by an attorney can cost $5,000. Going to court can add tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees. Many businesses simply settle.
"There isn't any protection for businesses like ours," said Sarfaraz (Raz) Bajwa, chief executive of a Plymouth logistics technology firm, IndusTrack. Bajwa's firm has paid three confidential settlements to alleged patent trolls, the most recent one last year.
"We had to pay them," Bajwa said. "You look at the business justification, and say it doesn't make sense for me to go to court."
The problem is not just limited to technology firms. Local pizza chain Davanni's was targeted by a patent troll in 2011, after it posted an online nutrition calculator for its menu, said Davanni's President Bob Stupka. A small northern Minnesota movie theater sought help from Attorney General Lori Swanson's office when a Texas-based firm targeted hundreds of businesses in the state, leading to a 2013 settlement by Swanson's office.