When President Donald Trump recently recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital and promised to move the U.S. embassy there, Israelis celebrated by projecting a powerful symbol on an old stone wall in Jerusalem — the American and Israeli flags, together as one.
That image proclaimed what the rest of the world has known for a long time: The U.S. is not the honest broker needed in the conflict between Palestinians and Israelis.
Trump's unilateral decision to grant Israelis' desire for formal recognition of Jerusalem as their capital comes 100 years after another incendiary move by a great power — the Balfour Declaration of 1917. Israelis regard the Balfour Declaration as the foundation stone of their country's legitimacy. Others regard it as an act of British imperialist hubris that American politicians of both parties seem determined to surpass.
With his signature ignorance of history, Trump has bookended Balfour, figuratively scrawling a crude orange smiley face and giant exclamation point on the infamous document.
A hundred years ago, while Britain was mired in World War I, the young movement known as Zionism was encouraging Europe's Jews to start colonies in Palestine. The Zionists envisioned turning all of Palestine into a majority Jewish state — a plan that disregarded the existence of those who already lived there, the Arabs of Palestine.
The Balfour Declaration was a short letter written by Lord Balfour, the British foreign secretary, to Lord Rothschild, a British Zionist. The letter expressed the British government's support for a Jewish homeland in Palestine. The letter also contained an often-overlooked caveat conditioning Britain's support on "it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine ... ."
Palestine at the time was controlled by the Ottoman Empire, soon to be defeated in the war. The allied victors awarded Britain control of Palestine, and the Zionist colonial enterprise accelerated under the watchful, helpful eyes of the British military. Whether all of the consequences of Balfour's letter were intended or not, the caveat about not harming the rights of non-Jews in Palestine was mostly ignored.
Several weeks ago, I visited Balfour's ground zero, Jerusalem. There, at the Anglican Cathedral Church of St. George, once the religious home of British rulers in Palestine, the congregation was planning to commemorate the Balfour centennial. It would be no celebration. Rather, they planned to ask the British government to repent for Balfour and finally make good on the document's caveat about the rights of Palestine's "non-Jewish communities."