Higher taxes may not mean more revenue

The dollar has tanked this year, though the drop has been fairly steady and orderly. That may be about to change.

The history of financial markets suggests that crashes are painfully common. Steady bad news very often leads to a rout. Sadly, the scenario that turns the dollar's bear market into a crash is beginning to look like a sure thing.

If a dollar crash were to occur, it might happen because foreign investors decide that the U.S. has fallen into a so-called tax trap. A tax trap occurs when a nation finds itself unable to increase revenue by lifting tax rates. Paired with mounting deficits, such a trap can lead to wholesale flight from a nation's assets. The Chinese will lend money only if they think we will pay it back.

Why might the United States be in a tax trap? The problem is that the U.S. income tax, a primary source of federal revenue, is very progressive, and has high rates. When rates are already high, it becomes harder and harder to raise money by lifting them more. This is, of course, the observation that made economist Arthur Laffer famous, and for the United States it is a real concern.

First, our corporate tax rate is the world's second-highest, and a number of recent studies have found that such rates don't lead to more revenue. This version of the Laffer curve is now fairly widely acknowledged.

But what is less commonly understood is that our graduated individual income tax also probably has reached the point where higher rates raise little new revenue, at least given the political landscape. President Obama has pledged to only increase taxes on those with incomes higher than $250,000. But lifting only that top marginal rate can have perverse revenue effects.

When tax rates go up, wealthy individuals have many options to reduce their tax bill. They can work a little less and purchase municipal bonds that pay tax-free interest, among other things.

If you only change the top rate, then it gets surprisingly hard to generate additional revenue, even when income adjustments are small.

Let's take the tax changes the Democrats have planned for next year. They want to let the top marginal rate go from 35 percent to 39.6 percent, and to reduce the value of itemized deductions in a way that adds a little more than a percent to the marginal tax rate, making the total 40.8 percent.

The top income tax rate kicks in for a married couple at $372,951. Everyone with an income above that will face the higher rate, and some will adjust their taxable income down accordingly.

How big will that adjustment be? A study by Emmanuel Saez, an economist at the University of California-Berkeley, suggests that these taxpayers would reduce their income by about 5.2 percent.

If incomes do decline in that amount, then the tax increases will raise very little revenue. Indeed, the breakeven point for the government is surprisingly high. For every individual who has income below about $613,000, the government will actually lose money because of the tax hike. The 35 cents lost for every dollar of income reduction isn't offset by the roughly 6 cents gained on the income that remains.

The government deficit already looks like it will approach $1 trillion a year over the next decade. But in fact, the higher tax rates, especially those that are, as in the health-care bill, paired with higher spending, are going to make it worse.