Columnist Jennifer Brooks got it right ("Small men shrug off America's big guns," Aug. 9). As we in Minnesota and the nation struggle to understand and develop strategies to address the complexities of this ongoing tragedy, it is beyond outrageous that some of the most obvious and straightforward actions are stymied here in our Minnesota Legislature (as Brooks says, "The Minnesota Senate is where gun safety legislation goes to die"). When Senate Majority Leader Paul Gazelka, R-Nisswa, tweets that there is essentially nothing the government can do to stop the next mass shooting, so why even try, he declares himself to be unfit as a Minnesota legislator. Has he even taken the time to read and consider the data on curbing gun violence? Certainly, one would assume this to be an important responsibility as a legislative leader in a time of crisis.
It is past time for all of us to act; we must demand responsible action from our legislators, and, failing that, we must remove from office those "small" men and women who refuse to work toward meaningful, comprehensive solutions. People are dying.
Susan Sisola, Minneapolis
• • •
One reader ("Do research before legislating guns," Readers Write, Aug. 8) suggests that we wait before we take any action on gun violence or pass any legislation in order to gather more "information" and research the problem.
But under lobbying from the National Rifle Association, Republicans have stymied any federal funding of such research (under the Dickey Amendment) and similar restrictions are in effect in Minnesota (Minnesota Statute 144.05). If nothing else, legislation to lift these restrictions needs to be passed, and right now. That said, we have plenty of data already for more comprehensive legislation.
The reader then suggests that we take into account that "morality standards have lost popularity," "boundaries of behavior have disappeared," "dysfunctional lifestyles have become more acceptable," "government programs have institutionalized breeding grounds for violence," and the "sanctity and value of human life has declined," all presented as fact without any research or evidence. And he leaves it unstated what he alludes to with "dysfunctional lifestyles," but I would hazard a guess that those with the alternative lifestyles that concern him are not the ones shooting up schools, churches, synagogues and nightclubs.
Arne Langsetmo, Robbinsdale
• • •
Perhaps the chant "Do something" that began in Dayton, Ohio, will catch on as a message to legislators regarding gun violence. It would fit on red and blue baseball caps.
Gary Erickson, New Brighton
• • •
The recent commentary from the Chicago Tribune's John Kass about gun violence was an unwelcome note to my vacation in Minnesota from Chicago ("It happens all the time but makes poor politics," Opinion Exchange, Aug. 8). Kass has staked out a fundamentalist GOP position that is toxic, like the threat of PolyMet pollution here in my pioneer Finnish family home in northern Minnesota.
Kass implies that Chicago gun violence is overlooked by Democrats and the media. But the problems there have been extensively covered by the media, and the new Democratic mayor has put it on the top of her agenda, as have the previous mayors. Kass' solution to gun violence is not to focus on reasonable gun legislation to chip away at a slaughter rate far higher than any industrial nation. His solution is to praise a concealed-carry U.S. Army private who intervened. We praise him, too, but this is obviously not the answer to mass murders.