Charter schools are overrated.
That was the motion recently debated in the Intelligence Squared series, a forum that "allows listeners to eavesdrop on the brightest minds," debating a range of current issues.
Arguing for the motion were (not was) two professors. Arguing against the motion were (not was) the founder of an education reform organization and a former commissioner of education.
During their 50-minute, 30-second debate (broadcast by Minnesota Public Radio on March 9), the four distinguished scholars, researchers and educators made a total of 17 grammatical errors.
Not counted were debatable errors such as using data as a singular word. (Data is the plural form of the Latin singular noun datum, but data is commonly used in the singular, as in "The data's not valid" and "The data is not the issue.")
Can you identify and correct their 17 grammatical errors in the numbered sentences below?
Finishing in last place was Speaker A, who in arguing against the motion made seven errors — two dangling modifiers, three errors in pronoun usage and two errors in subject-verb agreement.
1. When we talk about charter schools, we forget the fact that it was created and pushed by teachers.