Florida rated No. 1 best place to retire, but Minnesota is close

WalletHub study puts Midwestern states in the top 5 based on health, safety, cost of living.

The New York Times
December 7, 2025 at 11:00AM
A beach in Key West shows part of the attraction of retiring to Florida. But if you like seasons, the Midwest has good alternatives, according to WalletHub's annual ranking. (Scott McIntyre/The New York Times)

With its sunny beaches and friendly tax code, Florida is the best state to retire in, according to an annual study by WalletHub. But if you’re looking for a lower cost of living and you don’t mind experiencing all four seasons, you can find excellent alternatives in Western and Midwestern states.

Using data culled from sources including the U.S. Census Bureau, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the study assessed each state across three main weighted categories: affordability, quality of life and health care. Within these categories were 46 secondary metrics, such as share of population age 65 and older, quality of public hospitals and general tax friendliness.

Florida has sun and sand, and it also has the third-highest percentage of older residents, and plenty for them to do. And then there’s what it doesn’t have: state income, inheritance or estate taxes.

“There’s a lot of talk in Florida now about doing away with property taxes, which would make it even more appealing to retirees,” said Chip Lupo, a WalletHub analyst, though he cautioned that high prices are spurring some retirees to look elsewhere.

Minnesota is colder and less tax friendly, but it finished in second place thanks to its stellar health care, with the highest number of facilities (including the original and largest Mayo Clinic campus) and the second most nursing homes of any state. Overall, its seniors are healthier and safer.

Colorado, with its excellent health care and lack of estate or inheritance taxes, finished third, followed by Wyoming and South Dakota. Wyoming was found to be the most affordable state and offered a high quality of life, but it finished 38th in health care, “because it’s sparsely populated and access might be a problem,” Lupo said. South Dakota scored points for its many employed seniors, a strong nursing workforce and its top-ranked geriatric hospitals.

Best and worst states for retirement

The 10 best states for retirement and the categories in which they scored highest, and the 10 worst states and the categories in which they scored lowest.

BEST

1. Florida: Affordability, quality of life

2. Minnesota: Health care, quality of life

3. Colorado: Health care, affordability

4. Wyoming: Affordability, quality of life

5. South Dakota: Health care, affordability

6. Pennsylvania: Quality of life, health care

7. New Hampshire: Quality of life, health care

8. Delaware: Affordability, health care

9. North Dakota: Health care, affordability

10. Wisconsin: Affordability, quality of life

A retired doctor skis at Como Regional Park in St. Paul in 2007. (Jim Gehrz/The Minnesota Star Tribune)

WORST

50. Kentucky: Health care, quality of life

49. Louisiana: Health care, quality of life

48. Mississippi: Quality of life, health care

47. Washington: Affordability, health care

46. New Mexico: Quality of life, affordability

45. New Jersey: Affordability, quality of life

44. Rhode Island: Affordability, quality of life

43. West Virginia: Health care, quality of life

42. Arkansas: Quality of life, health care

41. Hawaii: Affordability, quality of life

about the writer

about the writer

Arnesa A. Howell

More from The Good Life

See More
card image
Scott McIntyre/The New York Times

WalletHub study puts Midwestern states in the top 5 based on health, safety, cost of living.

card image
FILE - This Wednesday, May 30, 2007, file photo shows a cable box on top of a television in Philadelphia. Cable boxes may not be very exciting, but theyíre emerging as a new battleground over the future of TV. Technology companies and the government want to open up the boxes to new services and programming. Cable companies want to keep control in their own hands. The outcome could affect what you pay for television and whether youíll still need to clutter your entertainment center with