Opinion editor's note: Star Tribune Opinion publishes a mix of national and local commentaries online and in print each day. To contribute, click here.
•••
Voters in Hennepin County will face a stark choice Nov. 8 in deciding who should serve as the next Hennepin County attorney. As a former prosecutor and longtime law school professor advocating for criminal justice reform, I strongly believe that Martha Holton Dimick is the best qualified candidate to become the new chief prosecutor for the county. My belief is based in part on observing the consequences of a similar choice that voters in Pima County (Tucson), Ariz., faced in the fall of 2020.
My wife and I live in a downtown Minneapolis condo during part of the year, a convenient location for me to teach at the University of St. Thomas School of Law. We spend winter and spring in Tucson, where I have been a visiting professor at the University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law. At both schools, I have taught courses on reforming our criminal justice system, with a focus on expanding restorative justice.
Hennepin County and Pima County are strikingly similar, starting with their current populations (1,282,000 vs. 1,056,000). Their largest cities, Minneapolis and Tucson, have similar populations (439,000 vs. 547,000) and liberal political leanings, and are surrounded by more politically moderate suburbs.
In fall 2020, the long-serving Pima County attorney retired and voters were faced with the choice of replacing her with an experienced prosecutor from her office who promised continued reform versus a public defender who had no prosecution experience and promised to radically transform the office in a "progressive" way. As happened in San Francisco and then elsewhere in the aftermath of George Floyd's murder, voters chose the "progressive prosecutor," and she assumed office in January 2021.
Her election has been a major setback for Pima County. Within her first few months, her inexperience and issues with ethics rules caused the public resignation of the office's chief civil deputy, the office's ethics attorney, and the head of the office's torts (civil law) unit. Three other attorneys in that unit soon left.
Worse was to come in combating crime. Within her first six months in office, the heads of the office's homicide unit, charging section, violent crimes section, and conviction integrity attorney all resigned or were demoted to the point they felt forced out and then left. Instead, she brought in a team of people who had virtually no prosecution experience or even experience in running an office. Morale plummeted and has remained low. Almost one-fourth of the office's employees have left.