UCare's bid for a valuable state contract came with a much higher price tag than those from competitors, according to documents released Tuesday, and the gap helps explain why the state is switching more than 350,000 enrollees in public insurance programs to other health plans.
To illustrate the cost difference, state officials said taxpayers would need to spend an extra $137 million next year if all program enrollees in Hennepin County were covered through UCare rather than by Minnetonka-based Medica, which had the lowest cost bid in the state's most populous county.
But the decision also was based on the "technical" merits of bids, including the quality of services provided and the network of health plan providers.
It was a closer call on those scores, but Minneapolis-based UCare still didn't keep pace with bids from Medica, Bloomington-based HealthPartners and Blue Plus, which is a division of Eagan-based Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota.
"On price, their bid was not competitive across most regions of the state," said Lucinda Jesson, the state human services commissioner. "Their technical score is closer, but it was still surpassed by higher scoring plans in most counties."
In a statement, UCare executives said they were still evaluating the data but defended the cost bid by saying it represented a discount on rates the HMO received last year.
"Our proposed rates were actuarially sound and sustainable, and they were 5 percent lower on average than our 2014 rates," the company said. "We believed our proposed rates would be competitive, and would ensure the financial stability of these important programs and access to quality medical care for members."
For decades, Minnesota has hired managed care organizations for most covered in the state's Medical Assistance and MinnesotaCare programs, which provide health insurance to lower income residents. Over the past four years, the state has phased in a competitive bidding process when awarding these contracts to health plans.