Question: If global warming is justification to open the Minnesota fishing season a week earlier than is currently the case, why is it I so often freeze my tail off on that much anticipated Saturday in May? Answer: Because it's cold.
Another answer: Because global warming might be here and it might be real, but it in no way -- notwithstanding what Gov. Tim Pawlenty, his wife, Mary, and, especially, state Sen. Satveer Chaudhary might want you to believe -- justifies opening the fishing season a week earlier.
Take a look at the tables that accompany this column. Star Tribune researcher Roberta Hovde gathered weather data for the fishing openers 1997-2007 and also for a 10-year period a half-century ago, 1947-1957.
Comparisons aren't exact, because the day the Minnesota fishing season opened changed from one period to the other. But they're close enough.
Three locations were chosen: Minneapolis, Brainerd and International Falls. Hovde looked at the high and low temperatures on the opener for each location, as well as precipitation amounts.
See any big difference between the two periods?
Neither do I. In fact, the warmest temperature (85) was recorded in the earlier period. And the coldest (43) was in the most recent 10-year span.
This isn't to say global warming doesn't exist (save your e-mails). Nor am I making the case based on this rather cursory look at Minnesota fishing-opener conditions that spring is not arriving ever earlier in the state, and waters warming sooner.