Ameriprise Financial Inc.'s 2010 purchase of Columbia Management from Bank of America was hailed as a bold, transformational event for the Minneapolis financial firm.
The billion-dollar gamble vaulted Ameriprise into the mutual fund major leagues and went a long way toward redefining Ameriprise from insurance provider to asset manager.
But there's been a vexing struggle. Investors -- retail and institutional alike -- have been pulling more money from the coffers of Boston-based Columbia Management than they've been putting in for 11 straight quarters. On a yearly basis, Columbia has been in net outflows since 2006.
In fact, last year Columbia had larger total net outflows than almost any other fund manager in the country. Through the end of November, investors yanked a net $13.8 billion from Columbia's institutional and retail businesses. That put Columbia second from the bottom among long-term U.S. fund managers, according to data from Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.
Ameriprise executives say they're attacking the river of outflows on several fronts, but the withdrawals have industry analysts concerned. After all, heavy withdrawals can erode the asset base on which a company earns management fees.
Edward Shields, associate director at investment bank Sandler O'Neill, said he doesn't see Columbia's flow situation turning around until 2014.
"The fact that it's still ongoing is a little surprising," Shields said. "It certainly has factored into my hold rating on [Ameriprise]."
Columbia's outflows are coming from both its retail business in mutual funds and its institutional side, which invests in a range of assets, but not mutual funds, for clients such as foundations and corporations. A key driver on both sides, the company says, is the loss of business from Columbia's former parent companies, American Express and Bank of America. Ameriprise executives have repeatedly said they expected that migration out.