As legislators work in conference committee to finalize Minnesota's health insurance exchange, their decisions will serve either small businesses that are being crushed under the weight of insurance costs or an insurance industry with skyrocketing profits.
When the federal Affordable Care Act (ACA) was passed in 2010, it stipulated that each state must develop such an exchange. Exchanges centralize insurance plans into an online "marketplace." Ideally, they create a one-stop shop where individuals and small businesses can easily compare and buy quality plans. It is estimated that Minnesota's exchange will serve 1.2 million people.
States have great latitude establishing exchanges. If developed correctly, an exchange can make buying insurance easier while lowering costs and increasing quality. It can foster competition and encourage providers to place a greater emphasis on value and affordability.
Conversely, millions of taxpayer dollars could be misdirected to give the insurance industry free advertising and access to hundreds of thousands of new customers.
Key to serving Minnesotans is the active-purchaser model. The state must actively select insurance plans for its exchange. Active purchasers can foster competition between insurers that want access to new customers and billions in sales while protecting the interests of small businesses by ensuring that plans offer the best coverage for the best price. The model also can ensure ongoing quality improvement and innovation, as opposed to plans that simply meet static or minimal criteria.
However, highly paid lobbyists are influencing legislators to allow all plans that meet minimal, static criteria into our exchange. Not only does this threaten competition, quality and continual improvement, it allows the exchange to be flooded. Market flooding is a gimmick to create so many choices that consumers' selections become somewhat random. This lessens the need to compete on quality, price or other values.
The Senate has held steadfast to active-purchaser tenets. Meanwhile, the House, after eight committee approvals, introduced an 11th-hour amendment to greatly dilute the model by allowing 88 plans into our exchange that simply meet minimal standards.
The conference committee must keep a strong active-purchaser model in place.