I must take exception to Lori Sturdevant's May 20 column ("Regent pick was distorted by partisanship"). Randy Simonson has the experience, education, business experience and — most important — life experience to help lead the University of Minnesota from the regent's chair to which he has been elected. The tone of the column is rude and demeaning to Simonson and the legislators of our great state.
Sturdevant is correct that the university is a land grant institution and that it should represent all of Minnesota, which includes agriculture and the related biosciences. The U medical school is equally important. The regent position in the First Congressional District has been held by Rochester and the Mayo Clinic for a very long time (some have told me the Rochester/Mayo community even thinks it owns this seat).
St. Paul DFL Sen. Richard Cohen's comment — "A significant part of the University of Minnesota has been the medical school, and that's also a place where there have been real problems over a number of years" — doesn't make sense.
With representation on the Board of Regents for many years from Rochester/Mayo, why hasn't progress been made? Maybe Rochester/Mayo needs to up the ante and contribute more resources to the U, not just comments from the regent seat.
At the candidate forum, I visited with Dr. Brooks Edwards of Mayo, who would probably also make an excellent choice. I told Edwards about my own experience with cardiology at Mayo. I only hope that after responding to this opinion piece, I do not have to go back early for my annual heart checkup.
That said, the Mayo system is very important to our state both economically and in terms of quality of life.
Higher-education executive Mary Davenport no doubt also has the credentials to be on the regents board with her years of experience in the Minnesota State system. I enjoyed visiting with her also at the candidate forum, when she admired our own Minnesota West two-year college in Worthington for its housing innovation.
And, by the way, I thank Simonson for having the courage to express his opinion on abortion and the use of fetal tissue in a public university. As divisive an issue as abortion is in our country, we ought not use public funds for this. We are only fueling the fire of this debate.