Combat translators spoke for us. Now we must speak for them.

Nine years ago, Taliban insurgents attacked me and my squad during a routine mission in Afghanistan's Ghazni province. Those insurgents would have killed us had it not been for Janis Shenwary, our Afghan translator, who shot and killed two of them.

I approached Janis the next morning in our base's chow hall and asked him why he saved us. His answer: "You are a guest in my country. It is an honor to protect those who are fighting for us." That day we became brothers, and I promised to one day bring him to America.

Janis finally arrived in the U.S. in 2013 on a special immigrant visa after four years of vetting. Now, the two of us are on a mission to fulfill America's promise to other wartime allies looking to come to the U.S..

But that's not enough. We need to properly honor the service of those who put their lives at risk standing shoulder to shoulder with the American military.

First, Congress should expand the special immigrant visa program — a valuable strategic tool that protects our allied men and women overseas. Unfathomably, the visa program is in critical condition. There are more than 14,000 such visa applications from Afghans pending at the State Department, but Congress has agreed to add only 2,500 visas to the 1,500 allowed for this year under the National Defense Authorization Act.

Are we really willing to tell those who fought with our country that it's OK with us if they die at the hands of the same enemies we asked them to help fight? Is that what the U.S. now stands for? Or will we have the courage and conviction to live up to our values?

Opponents of the special immigrant visa program claim that Afghan and Iraqi combat translators and their families rely heavily on state and federal welfare programs. But spend any time with these immigrants, and you'll realize that characterization is unfair. These men and women give much more back to their new communities than they ever take in and have earned their place in our communities through their profound sacrifice and service.

Ask your Uber or Lyft drivers whether they served in Afghanistan. If they did, their stories will humble you. Ask any service member if our Afghan and Iraqi translators were critical to the mission. Their responses will only confirm our belief that these heroes are our fellow veterans. Yet these people receive no health or educational benefits just because of where they were born.

This threatens America's reputation abroad. We have a simple, innovative solution: Congress should declare simple immigrant visa recipients "honorary veterans." Such a classification wouldn't entitle them to typical benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs, but it would unleash the support of the private sector.

These visa holders would finally be able to take advantage of nonprofit organizations benefiting veterans, as well as any company that has a veterans' employment or development program. This would immediately help all of the combat translators and their family members who have already been settled nationwide — at no cost to taxpayers.

And if you're still not convinced, ask the men of the Pennsylvania National Guard 103rd Armored Regiment if their translator, whom they recently welcomed into the country at Dulles International Airport in Washington, is a veteran.

There's also precedent for this: After World War II, the U.S. promised to treat more than 250,000 Filipino soldiers who fought alongside U.S. forces as veterans (although it ended up only partly fulfilling that promise). To this day, there is still an American VA regional office in Manila.

In other words, only in America do certain dreams become reality. Yes, people are still fighting and dying for a chance — just a chance — to experience that reality for their families. We owe that to them. We must remain shoulder to shoulder with our allies.