Minnesota Revenue Commissioner Myron Frans, an even-keeled tax lawyer who also has run a technology-growth business, has some Democrats as well as Republicans fighting the business-to-business taxation portion of the governor's sales-tax overhaul proposal.
Frans disputes that Gov. Mark Dayton's proposed business-to-business sales tax was "a Trojan horse or some idea to divert attention away from other parts of the plan," namely Dayton's pledge to raise the top tax rate to 9.8 percent on joint filers with incomes over $250,000. That's a 2-percentage-point jump above today's top marginal rate.
Dayton wants to broaden Minnesota's regionally high 6.85 percent sales tax and cut it to 5.5 percent by expanding it to consumer and business services and expensive clothing.
Predictably, the Mall of America and many retailers and consumer service providers who don't pay sales taxes are protesting. And Minnesota's sales tax is relatively narrow and complicated, including a tax on dog haircuts but not on people haircuts.
Many Democrats were surprised by Dayton's business-to-business tax proposal, arguing that it disproportionately impacts small businesses that lack law, tax or other departments and will have to pay taxes on services that big companies with in-house departments won't.
The business-to-business tax wasn't included in formal presession presentations by the Dayton administration.
"I was blindsided by the business-tax proposal and it's a bad idea," said Sen. Terri Bonoff, a DFLer from the western suburbs. "Many of my colleagues feel that way."
Dayton's higher income-tax rate that would kick in at $150,000 for individuals has generated far less heat so far than the idea of business-to-business taxes.